Although crimes are defined by mental intent, information about motives may not be required in court. As long as prosecutors can prove the elements of a crime, motive isn't needed to make the case. If a prosecutor can show the defendant a) took an illegal action, b) intended to take that action, and c) intent and action intersected, motive becomes irrelevant.

Agatha sneaks into Eric’s field and steals water out of his well. Agatha has committed theft because a) she took the water, b) she intended to take it, and c) her intent made the taking of the water happen. Why did she take it though?

Although in most cases the law doesn't care, juries often do. Was Agatha dying of thirst? Did Agatha target Eric out of spite?

1. As an investigator in this case, would understanding Agatha's motive be important? Why or why not?
2. As a juror, would Agatha’s motive be important to you? Why or why not?