Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

The U.S. Constitution is a rather short generally-worded document that can mean different things to different people These characteristics make the Constitution flexible because it can be updated through judicial interpretation without needing frequent amendments. However, changing the Constitution through judicial interpretation is undemocratic, since it puts power in the hands of unelected judges. What would you rather have: a loose constitution that can be updated by court decisions, or a rigid constitution that relies on popular amendments to keep up with the times?