You can agree with this statement if you believe that the middle class can fairly represent everyone and make decisions to promote the good of all.
According to Aristoteles, the middle class would be the most appropriate to make the country's political decisions. He believed that this was possible because the middle class represented the whole of society, understood everyone's problems, and would be able to make fair decisions for everyone.
He emphasized that the rich class could not make decisions because they did not understand how the poor could be affected. The poor, likewise, could not make decisions because they did not understand how the rich would be affected. Furthermore, the poor class and the rich class did not trust each other.
However, as the middle class was able to represent the rich and the poor and understand them, they were the ideal group to be the social "arbitrator", that is, the one who makes decisions.
Although Aristotle's thinking is well structured, many people do not agree with him, as they believe that members of the middle class would not think of making decisions that would help other classes, but that would help themselves to ascend socially and become part of the rich class.
Based on that, you can decide whether you agree with Aristotle or not. An example of how you can voice your opinion can be seen below.
I do not agree that the middle class is the most appropriate to be the "arbiter" of society because it would not work in favor of the poorest class. Members of the middle class do not see themselves closer to both classes, but the rich class. This would make them work to ascend socially and provide resources for the wealthy class to value them. Therefore, the poor class would be neglected and would suffer hard.
Learn more about the middle class:
https://brainly.com/question/4324056
#SPJ1
