Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Experience the convenience of getting reliable answers to your questions from a vast network of knowledgeable experts. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in different areas.

Is sugarman persuasive that the assumption of risk doctrine serves no useful role in modern courts? this may seem theoretical, but issues like this do significantly shape litigation and the way that lawyers think about tort law. as a test case to consider, should someone who intentionally runs into a burning building in order to rescue a child be able to sue the person who negligently set the building on fire if the rescuer gets injured?