Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Is sugarman persuasive that the assumption of risk doctrine serves no useful role in modern courts? this may seem theoretical, but issues like this do significantly shape litigation and the way that lawyers think about tort law. as a test case to consider, should someone who intentionally runs into a burning building in order to rescue a child be able to sue the person who negligently set the building on fire if the rescuer gets injured?