Looking for reliable answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Is sugarman persuasive that the assumption of risk doctrine serves no useful role in modern courts? this may seem theoretical, but issues like this do significantly shape litigation and the way that lawyers think about tort law. as a test case to consider, should someone who intentionally runs into a burning building in order to rescue a child be able to sue the person who negligently set the building on fire if the rescuer gets injured?