purpleclover2006
Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to all your questions. Ask, explore, and learn with our expert community. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Premises:
If two triangles are congruent, their corresponding angles are congruent.
△ABC and △QRS are not congruent.

Conclusion:
The corresponding angles of △ABC and △QRS are not congruent.



Which statement best describes this argument?

Responses

The argument is valid by the law of syllogism.
The argument is valid by the law of syllogism.

The argument is valid by the law of detachment.
The argument is valid by the law of detachment.

The argument is invalid because the conclusion does not follow the premises.
The argument is invalid because the conclusion does not follow the premises.

The argument is invalid because the premises are not true.

Sagot :

We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.