Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.
Sagot :
The Supreme Court (c) determined race may be a factor when admitting students, but not the only factor. It upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy, not just to fulfill a quota.
Correct answer:
C. It determined that race may be a factor when admitting students, but not the only factor.
Details:
The Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, if schools practiced great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.
The essence of the decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978) was that the Court upheld affirmative action. It allowed race to be considered as one of several factors in college admission policy. But establishing specific racial quotas was an approach that the Court said was not allowable.
We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.
