Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca, where our expert community is always ready to help with accurate information. Join our Q&A platform and get accurate answers to all your questions from professionals across multiple disciplines. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

In part III of the statute, Jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringing on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. Why might Jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? What does he gain by doing this? What might he lose? Answers should be at least 150 words.