In the introductory paragraph of this chapter historically Columbus was interpreted as an of genocide, a slave trader, thief, pirate, and certainly not a hero, and a pioneer of progress and enlightenment as well.
The two historical interpretations of Columbus mentioned in the introductory paragraph of this chapter are:
Interpretation 1: Columbus was a perpetrator of genocide, a slave trader, thief, pirate, and certainly not a hero.
Interpretation 2: He was a pioneer of progress and enlightenment.
Contrary to what is written in most history texts, Christopher Columbus was not a true hero. Instead, he made false promises and was dishonest with individuals who helped finance his travels. Additionally, he was a ruthless oppressor of the Arawak Indians and other locals in the places he frequented.
Columbus is presented as a heroic, nearly heavenly figure in many conventional history books who sacrificed his life to set sail for the New World.
Morison “covers up” these brave truths by claiming that Columbus was still admirable despite his failings, even though he is so bold as to call Columbus' harshness genocide.
To learn more about Columbus, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/14393581?referrer=searchResults
#SPJ4