Welcome to Westonci.ca, your one-stop destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community now! Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The author says they might support a law ban flag burning if it created exceptions for t-shirts, plates, and napkins. The Court has recognized that the primary change protects bound sorts of symbolic speech. Flag burning is such a sort of symbolic speech.
Once a flag is in camera owned, the owner ought to be ready to burn it if the owner chooses, particularly if this action is supposed within the sort of protest.
The act of draft card burning was defended as a symbolic sort of free speech, a constitutional right warranted by the primary change. The Supreme Court determined against the draft card burners; it determined that the federal law was even which it absolutely unrelated to the liberty of speech.
To learn more about the law ban flag, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/8992381
#SPJ4
We hope this information was helpful. Feel free to return anytime for more answers to your questions and concerns. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.
