Westonci.ca is your go-to source for answers, with a community ready to provide accurate and timely information. Explore a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

Which of the following concepts were considered in Gradjelick v. Hance, the case in the text in which the plaintiff alleged that the landlord exacerbated a fire caused by another tenant smoking, by failing to maintain the premises?O The court articulated the test for per se code violations.O The court considered how a rent escalation clause would impact the landlord-tenant relationship.O The court ruled that by failing to act to protect the plaintiff, the landlord was liable to the plaintiff for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment.O The court ruled that only because the lease itself placed a duty of quiet enjoyment on the landlord, the landlord had a duty to control the actions of the upstairs tenant.O The court contemplated the issue related to a landlord's lien in the context of the case.

Sagot :

The plaintiff alleged that the landlord exacerbated a fire caused by another tenant smoking, by failing to maintain the premises is :

A)The correct answer to this question is the last option an illegal alteration. This is because she has illegally cut down the tree.

B)The correct answer to this question is the second option. This is because, in most states, tenants cannot make alterations or changes that affect the condition of the premises, without the landlord’s consent.

C)The correct answer to this question is the second option. This is because this clause means that the premises are fit for ordinary residential purposes.

D)The correct answer to this question is the Last option. This is calculated because the court contemplated the issue related to a landlord's lien in the context of the case.

E)The correct answer to this question is the Fourth option A protection lien. This is because this law references a landlord's right in some states to some or all of the tenant's personal property in the event that a tenant refuses to pay rent.

Learn more about premises here https://brainly.com/question/5497205

#SPJ4