Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
At the significance level, 0.01
p-Value=0.973 > 0.01 which implies fail to reject null hypothesis and no evidence to support the claim.
So, there is no reason to believe that this increase in substrate concentration causes an increase in the mean velocity of the reaction of more than 0.5 micromole per 30 minutes.
We have given that,
A study conducted to see if increasing the substrate concentration has an appreciable effect on the velocity of a chemical reaction.
x₁-bar = 8.8 micromoles
Standaard deviations, s₁= 1.2
x₂-bar = 7.5 ; s₂ = 1.5
n₁ = 12 ; n₂ = 15
significance level = 0.01
Consider the Null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis othesis
H₀ : μ = 0.5
Hₐ : μ > 0.5
Consider,
Pooled Standard Deviation = √(((n₁ - 1)s₁² + (n₂- 1)s₂²)/(n₁ + n₂-2))
plugging all known values
= sqrt(((12-1)(1.2²) + (15 -1)(1.5²))/(12+15-2))
Sp = 1.3761
Now , test statistic :
t =((x₁-bar - x₂-bar) - 0.5) / (Sp×√(1/n₁+ 1/n₂))
substitute all known values we get,
= ((8.8 - 7.5) - 0.5) / (1.3761× sqrt(1/12 + 1/15))
=> t = 1.5
Degree of freedom = n₁+ n₂ - 2
= 12 + 15 - 2
= 25
Now the p-value corresponding to t = 1.5 & df = 25 is 0.073
Here p-value > 0.01 (significance level) thus, we fail to reject null hypothesis.
So there is no enough evidence to support the claim.
To learn more about Hypothesis testing, refer:
https://brainly.com/question/4232174
#SPJ4
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.