Answered

Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.

TRUE/FALSE. when the supreme court struck down section of the voting rights act, texas no longer had to receive federal approval before changing any in-state voting procedure.

Sagot :

It is false that when the supreme court struck down section of the voting rights act, Texas no longer had to receive federal approval before changing any in-state voting procedure.

In Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that Section 4(b) of the Act's coverage formula was unconstitutional. As a result, no jurisdictions are any longer subject to Section 4 (bcoverage )'s formula or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of the Act. 

Only those areas—mostly states, but also some counties—where there has a history of discrimination in the application of election laws are covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.

Before local rules that impact voting can be modified, those jurisdictions must obtain approval from a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., or the U.S. Department of Justice.

To know more about 'voting rights act' related questions

visit- https://brainly.com/question/29220928

#SPJ4