Looking for answers? Westonci.ca is your go-to Q&A platform, offering quick, trustworthy responses from a community of experts. Discover detailed solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
It is false that when the supreme court struck down section of the voting rights act, Texas no longer had to receive federal approval before changing any in-state voting procedure.
In Shelby County v. Holder, 570 U.S. 529 (2013), the Supreme Court ruled that Section 4(b) of the Act's coverage formula was unconstitutional. As a result, no jurisdictions are any longer subject to Section 4 (bcoverage )'s formula or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of the Act.
Only those areas—mostly states, but also some counties—where there has a history of discrimination in the application of election laws are covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act.
Before local rules that impact voting can be modified, those jurisdictions must obtain approval from a three-judge panel in Washington, D.C., or the U.S. Department of Justice.
To know more about 'voting rights act' related questions
visit- https://brainly.com/question/29220928
#SPJ4
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.