Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where your questions are met with accurate answers from a community of experts and enthusiasts. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

Which of the following was the result on appeal in Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corporation, the case in the text in which the tenant claimed that under the Fair Housing Act she was entitled to reasonable accommodation in cleaning her apartment due to her mood disorder?
Multiple Choice
The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that the Fair Housing Act did not have sections requiring accommodation.
The court ruled in favor of the landlord on the basis that while accommodations may be required at times under the Fair Housing Act, assisting with cleaning is not one of them.
The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant had established a reasonable basis supporting the need of reasonable accommodation in regard to cleaning.
The court ruled in favor of the tenant on the basis that the tenant suffered additional stress due to harassment regarding rent and that, therefore, the landlord was responsible for providing assistance with cleaning.
The appellate court remanded the case to the lower court to apply a test which focused on the landlord-tenant relationship, not on the impact one tenant has on other tenants, in order to determine whether the tenant was entitled to a reasonable accommodation.

Sagot :

The outcome of the Douglas v. Kriegsfeld Corporation appeal The appeal court remanded the case to the lower court so that it may decide whether the tenant was entitled to a reasonable accommodation by using a standard that put more emphasis on the landlord-tenant relationship than on how one tenant might affect other tenants.

The federal Fair Housing Act does not consider it fatal when a renter fails to specify what kind of accommodation she needs in her initial request. The Act requires landlords to respond as soon as a tenant requests a "reasonable accommodation" (or, without using those exact words, requests an accommodation for a disability), in accordance with applicable case law, including an administrative adjudication by the Department of Housing and Urban Development itself.

The Act, when properly interpreted, mandates that the landlord "open a dialogue" with the tenant, eliciting additional information as necessary, to ascertain what specifics the tenant has in mind and whether such accommodation would, in fact, be reasonable under the circumstances. If the request is not sufficiently detailed to reveal the nature of that request, the landlord is required to comply with the Act. The landlord may be held liable for any delays that result from a slow response to the tenant's request.

To know more about  Fair Housing Act click here,

https://brainly.com/question/29770958

#SPJ4

Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Find reliable answers at Westonci.ca. Visit us again for the latest updates and expert advice.