In 2021, a wildfire burned more than 10,000 acres in Presley, a small city on the edge of Florida’s Everglades. The fire damaged 86 homes, businesses, and other structures and caused over $40 million in damages. Wildfires require certain environmental conditions to spread, but the initial sparks sometimes come from electrical utility equipment and power lines. An investigation found that the origin of the Presley fire was a transmission tower, where one of the rows of hanging insulators had fallen to the ground. The insulators are designed to protect the tower from the electrical current flowing through the power lines, and they are hung with metal rings, called C-hooks. These C-hooks were manufactured by Seaborne Iron Works, Inc, who claims that the hooks should not wear more than 5 mm over a fifty-year lifespan. In cooperation with the power company, an independent investigator was hired by the city of Presley to collect data on a random sample of the C-hooks at various transmission towers in the area. It was found that several of the hooks were eroding at a faster rate than was promised by the Seaborne Iron Works when the local electric company purchased and installed them in the 1979. The local utility company has blamed Seaborne Iron Works, Inc. for manufacturing parts that have worn prematurely. Civil litigation against the manufacturer has ensued, and a class-action lawsuit has been brought forth. In a class-action lawsuit, a certified group of individuals – a group called Presley Homeowners, in this case – sues the defendant for financial damages. The judge in this case has requested an impartial expert witness, and you have been brought in as a forensic engineer. Forensic engineers investigate the causes of failure in engineering projects ranging from faulty machinery to collapsed buildings. You will analyze the data you have collected and come to a statistically informed conclusion with a confidence level of 99% on whether the C-hooks used on transmission towers in Presley have passed their recommended wear of 5.0 millimeters. The data provided by the independent investigator is below. Because it would be infeasible to test every C-hook in the area, eight transmission towers (labeled in the first column) were randomly selected, and the level of wear on the six C-hooks on each tower was measured. Does this sample data suggest that the average C-hook supplied by Seaborne Iron Works has passed 5.0 mm in wear? You will provide your findings in a memorandum addressed to the judge, Tonye Wasilic, and copied to the defense attorney, Michael Solara, and the plaintiffs' attorney Amena Hernandez. Remember that you are writing to convince the jury.1) What is known? What information AND data does the problem provide above? Provide a bullet-pointed list with complete descriptions of what you know about the problem above; include written elements as well as numeric information.2) What is unknown? What are you being asked to address? What is the problem above that needs an answer? You will not be describing a statistical outcome.3) What are the sample, population, and other parameters (e.g., sample or population mean, standard deviation)? The two below at minimum must be precisely described. Hint: there should be a number/quantification AND a measurable noun in your answers. What is the sample? What is the population?