Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Connect with professionals on our platform to receive accurate answers to your questions quickly and efficiently. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.


According to the article, In 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum
on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all
three branches of government coequal.
Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or
couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of
the other. In a
having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?