Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform, offering detailed and reliable answers from a knowledgeable community. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.
Sagot :
Because the Supreme Court determined that armbands constitute symbolic communication that is entirely distinct from the activities or conduct of individuals participating, Tinker v. Des Moines is still regarded as a crucial decision today. When on school grounds, students retain their First Amendment rights.
By holding that school administrators cannot prohibit student speech unless it fundamentally and seriously disrupts the educational process the court established a precedent that is still cited in student free speech cases, including Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier and Morse v. Frederick.
In Tinker v. Des Moines Metropolitan Community School District, the Supreme Court declared that public school administrators cannot limit student communication unless they can fairly predict that the speech will seriously disrupt school activities or breach the rights of others.
To learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines
https://brainly.com/question/29545250
#SPJ4
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.
