Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

How did the views that oralists held about deaf education differ from modern linguists?.

Sagot :

The views held by the oralists about deaf education differ from those held by modern linguists in the following way;

According to oralists, deaf children would struggle to learn languages (both spoken and written) using sign language and they would be secluded from the rest of the hearing community.  However modern linguists are of the idea that sign language improves deaf people's ability to learn languages.

Several studies carried out in the late 190s by modern linguists revealed that sign language is one of the best ways to improve the learning ability of languages for both hearing and deaf children and that the deaf community includes those close to the deaf in our society.

This is clearly different from what the oralists believed since their views were against sign language. They further believed that signing would separate them from the rest of the community and sabotage their ability of learning spoken and written languages.

Learn more about oralists and modern linguists at https://brainly.com/question/19435656?referrer=searchResults

#SPJ4

Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.