CharleneNevarrez
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.

Should the United States have taken a more active approach in the war prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor? Explain the pros and cons of such involvement.

Sagot :

Brick
yes i think because what they did to help would have still brought them trouble so why not go for it.if you think about the help they sent that was sending troops weapons and supplies that was still going to harm them.the attacks on the place that was  sent on the most active place used to send the items (and people) was basically the game plan of silencing them and the forces they sent if they still attacked them on a sensitive part say the presidency (white house)  it might have brought up the 3rd world war but this time against Japan.(please i need a brainiest answer to level up)
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thank you for using Westonci.ca. Come back for more in-depth answers to all your queries.