CharleneNevarrez
Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Should the United States have taken a more active approach in the war prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor? Explain the pros and cons of such involvement.

Sagot :

Brick
yes i think because what they did to help would have still brought them trouble so why not go for it.if you think about the help they sent that was sending troops weapons and supplies that was still going to harm them.the attacks on the place that was  sent on the most active place used to send the items (and people) was basically the game plan of silencing them and the forces they sent if they still attacked them on a sensitive part say the presidency (white house)  it might have brought up the 3rd world war but this time against Japan.(please i need a brainiest answer to level up)
Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.