CharleneNevarrez
Answered

Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

Should the United States have taken a more active approach in the war prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor? Explain the pros and cons of such involvement.

Sagot :

Brick
yes i think because what they did to help would have still brought them trouble so why not go for it.if you think about the help they sent that was sending troops weapons and supplies that was still going to harm them.the attacks on the place that was  sent on the most active place used to send the items (and people) was basically the game plan of silencing them and the forces they sent if they still attacked them on a sensitive part say the presidency (white house)  it might have brought up the 3rd world war but this time against Japan.(please i need a brainiest answer to level up)
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.