Westonci.ca is your trusted source for accurate answers to all your questions. Join our community and start learning today! Discover precise answers to your questions from a wide range of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Help?? The fact that the states had to unanimously agree to change the Articles of Confederation meant that the states could not begin the process of making changes to the government it didn't matter how ordinary citizens felt about the Articles of Confederation it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government it would be simple for states to grant additional power to the government

Sagot :

"it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government" is the best answer. The founders wanted to ensure a strong central government, and this could only happen if all states were on board.

The fact that the states had to unanimously agree to change the Articles of Confederation meant that it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government. The national government was very weak. There was no president and no Supreme Court to settle important arguments. The states looked upon themselves as separate countries. To change the Articles of Confederation they had to meet, which they did in Philadelphia in 1787.