Answered

Discover the answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts share their knowledge and insights with you. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Help?? The fact that the states had to unanimously agree to change the Articles of Confederation meant that the states could not begin the process of making changes to the government it didn't matter how ordinary citizens felt about the Articles of Confederation it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government it would be simple for states to grant additional power to the government

Sagot :

"it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government" is the best answer. The founders wanted to ensure a strong central government, and this could only happen if all states were on board.
fractureide

The fact that the states had to unanimously agree to change the Articles of Confederation meant that it would be very hard to make updates to address the weaknesses of the government. The national government was very weak. There was no president and no Supreme Court to settle important arguments. The states looked upon themselves as separate countries. To change the Articles of Confederation they had to meet, which they did in Philadelphia in 1787.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.