iiBlaxRose
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy for you to get the answers you need from a community of knowledgeable individuals. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Please help me edit this conclusion:

Question: Which of the materials, sugars, yeast,elodea,and sand, are non living, or abiotic? Which ones are biotic or abiotic? How would I find the non living items and and living items?

Hypothesis:My hypothesis is that the elodea would be biotic, or living, and that the sugar, yeast, and the sand would be non living. My guess is that the sugar,yeast and sand would be abiotic.

Conclusion:My hypothesis is was that the elodea would be biotic, or living, and that the sugar, yeast, and the sand would be non living. My guess is that the sugar, yeast and sand would be abiotic. I was right about the elodea,sand,and sugar. But I was surprised about the yeast, because it turned out to be biotic. When I first started, I thought that the yeast would abiotic, but it turned out to have cells and all the other 5 characteristics.The elodea was a plant and it had cells just as I expected. The sand and the sugar were abiotic because they have none of 6 characteristics needed to be biotic.All in all, I was right AND wrong. I was wrong about the yeast, but I was right for the other 3 substances.

Sagot :

i think your conclusion is pretty good.
just check for grammar and spelling if necessary
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.