LevyOlsen
Answered

At Westonci.ca, we make it easy to get the answers you need from a community of informed and experienced contributors. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

Why did Texas suffer less from the war than other areas of the South?

Sagot :

In the Civil War, Texas (young Texas) served as a support state, and there was barely any skrimishes in the state. Technically, by the governor's word (The governor at the time was Sam Houston), Texas was originally pro-Union, but the citizens wantes war as a way to assert the state's rights. Also, Texas did not fight for wealthy plantation owners in other states; Texas didn't have any cotton plantations compared to the other Southern states, so they didn't suffer as bad as a loss than the other states. Moreover, during the battles outside of the state, the Texan soldiers either deserted from warfare or joined the Union.
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.