Find the best answers to your questions at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts provide accurate, reliable information. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.
Sagot :
1990s from Butler, one of the leading names in the feminist theory, since after the September 11 attacks, the United States made from grief and assesses the impact of limiting violence in the public sphere.
good luck :)
good luck :)
First and foremost the law is unconstitutional since it is in direct violation of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution
it was necessary to combat "terrorism" and would be used only against terrorists. Already it is being used against Americans in non-terrorism contexts. (See Elliot Spitzer case). In other words, if the federal government wants the authority to wire tap all of us without prior proof of probable cause the proper and LEGAL method of doing so is via amending the constitution, a necessarily difficult process because the founders knew it should NEVER be easy to make changes to the constitution.
it was necessary to combat "terrorism" and would be used only against terrorists. Already it is being used against Americans in non-terrorism contexts. (See Elliot Spitzer case). In other words, if the federal government wants the authority to wire tap all of us without prior proof of probable cause the proper and LEGAL method of doing so is via amending the constitution, a necessarily difficult process because the founders knew it should NEVER be easy to make changes to the constitution.
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.