Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
1990s from Butler, one of the leading names in the feminist theory, since after the September 11 attacks, the United States made from grief and assesses the impact of limiting violence in the public sphere.
good luck :)
good luck :)
First and foremost the law is unconstitutional since it is in direct violation of the 4th Amendment to the Constitution
it was necessary to combat "terrorism" and would be used only against terrorists. Already it is being used against Americans in non-terrorism contexts. (See Elliot Spitzer case). In other words, if the federal government wants the authority to wire tap all of us without prior proof of probable cause the proper and LEGAL method of doing so is via amending the constitution, a necessarily difficult process because the founders knew it should NEVER be easy to make changes to the constitution.
it was necessary to combat "terrorism" and would be used only against terrorists. Already it is being used against Americans in non-terrorism contexts. (See Elliot Spitzer case). In other words, if the federal government wants the authority to wire tap all of us without prior proof of probable cause the proper and LEGAL method of doing so is via amending the constitution, a necessarily difficult process because the founders knew it should NEVER be easy to make changes to the constitution.
We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.