Tandra51
Answered

Discover the answers you need at Westonci.ca, a dynamic Q&A platform where knowledge is shared freely by a community of experts. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

What was the difference between Darwin and Lamarck? A. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Lamarck was able to prove it. B. Lamarck was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Darwin did not do. C. Darwin was able to explain evolution with evidence, something Lamarck did not do. D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it. I know it is definetly not b and c because they both had that in common

Sagot :

The main difference between Darwin and Lamarck was that "D. The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it" although this is a lot like answer C...
The opposition between Darwin and Lamarck is D)  The idea of mutations was understood by both, but Darwin was able to prove it.
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.