Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Experience the ease of finding accurate answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of professionals. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Correct answer:
D. ruled in favor of affirmative action within specified limits.
Details:
The Supreme Court's decision gave some credence to Allan Bakke's claim that the University of California at Davis had practiced some amount of reverse discrimination in denying him admittance to the medical school because he was not an economically or educationally disadvantaged member of one of four racial/ethnic groups eligible for their special admission program. But the Court was careful to note that race could be considered as a factor (among many factors) in college admissions, if schools practiced great care in doing so. Having a basic quota system, such as UC Davis reserving 16 spots out of 100 each year, was considered discriminatory.
The essence of the decision in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke was that the Court upheld affirmative action. It allowed race to be considered as one of several factors in college admission policy. But establishing specific racial quotas was an approach that the Court said was not allowable.
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.
