Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide detailed answers to your questions in various areas. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
The correct answer is D) court-appointed attorneys.
In this case, Clarence Gideon was originally chared with breaking and entering in the state of Florida. When he asked for an attorney, the Florida judge did not approve of it, as he said that attorneys could only be appointed to individuals in capital cases. Gideon argued that this refusal to provide an attorney violated his 6th amendment rights. This case was heard in the Supreme Court. The unanimous court sided with Gideon, upholding his 6th amendment rights.
We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. We're dedicated to helping you find the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Don't hesitate to return for more.