Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a community of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The correct answer is D) court-appointed attorneys.
In this case, Clarence Gideon was originally chared with breaking and entering in the state of Florida. When he asked for an attorney, the Florida judge did not approve of it, as he said that attorneys could only be appointed to individuals in capital cases. Gideon argued that this refusal to provide an attorney violated his 6th amendment rights. This case was heard in the Supreme Court. The unanimous court sided with Gideon, upholding his 6th amendment rights.
Thank you for choosing our service. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.