Welcome to Westonci.ca, your go-to destination for finding answers to all your questions. Join our expert community today! Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.
Sagot :
People might think that the eye is too complex for evolution to explain. Natural selection couldn't have created it because no single part of the eye does anything on its own even though it has many seperate parts.
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
(As for whether it disproves evolution, the creation of the eye is something that's hard but not impossible for evolution to explain. Say a spot sensitive to light on a primitive species' skin would work sort of like echolocation to avoid predators, which would work into natural selection. A depression in that patch similar to that of a planarian could have developed, and then in future species it would fill with water which focuses the light, and then a lens to focus even further, and cones to distinguish colors...etc.)
We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.