Answered

Westonci.ca is your trusted source for finding answers to a wide range of questions, backed by a knowledgeable community. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

in,1832 the united states supreme court ruled Worcester v. Georgia that the state of Georgia had no right to force the Cherokee from their native lands. Why did this ruling have little positive effect?

Sagot :

Basically, the decision of the supreme court was not respected by other authorities, specially by the president Andrew Jackson, who felt that on the one hand Georgia does not have to respect this ruling and on the other that the supreme court in any case cannot ensure the enforcement of it.

Specifically, the ruling of the court was that only the national government had the power to decide over Indian affairs, and since that power laid in Jackson's hands, he could allow Georgia to proceed with the removal of Cherokee by stating that he ( in the name of the national government) will not intervene. Instead, Jackson's actions were further adding to the removal of the Cherokee.
coriham02
Because Andrew Jackson did not follow through that the state of Georgia followed the act and Georgia forced the Cherokee to leave and they endevored on the trail of tears an 800 mile journey across the country
Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.