Answered

Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

in,1832 the united states supreme court ruled Worcester v. Georgia that the state of Georgia had no right to force the Cherokee from their native lands. Why did this ruling have little positive effect?

Sagot :

Basically, the decision of the supreme court was not respected by other authorities, specially by the president Andrew Jackson, who felt that on the one hand Georgia does not have to respect this ruling and on the other that the supreme court in any case cannot ensure the enforcement of it.

Specifically, the ruling of the court was that only the national government had the power to decide over Indian affairs, and since that power laid in Jackson's hands, he could allow Georgia to proceed with the removal of Cherokee by stating that he ( in the name of the national government) will not intervene. Instead, Jackson's actions were further adding to the removal of the Cherokee.
coriham02
Because Andrew Jackson did not follow through that the state of Georgia followed the act and Georgia forced the Cherokee to leave and they endevored on the trail of tears an 800 mile journey across the country
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.