Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

What was the effect of the Dred Scott decision? Congress could not prohibit slavery. Slavery was abolished in the South. Maine was admitted as a slave state.

Sagot :

The primary effect of the Dred Scott decision, based only on the option in this list, was that "Congress could not prohibit slavery," but mostly it meant that blacks weren't considered citizens and thus could not sue for their freedom.
francocanacari

Answer:

The effect of the Dred Scott decision was that Congress could not prohibit slavery.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court of that country in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. The fury that caused this ruling among the abolitionists was an important factor in the explosion of the Civil War.

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.