Answered

At Westonci.ca, we provide reliable answers to your questions from a community of experts. Start exploring today! Experience the ease of finding reliable answers to your questions from a vast community of knowledgeable experts. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.

What was the effect of the Dred Scott decision? Congress could not prohibit slavery. Slavery was abolished in the South. Maine was admitted as a slave state.

Sagot :

The primary effect of the Dred Scott decision, based only on the option in this list, was that "Congress could not prohibit slavery," but mostly it meant that blacks weren't considered citizens and thus could not sue for their freedom.
francocanacari

Answer:

The effect of the Dred Scott decision was that Congress could not prohibit slavery.

Explanation:

The case Dred Scott v. Sandford was a judicial claim, crucial in the history of the United States, resolved by the Supreme Court of that country in 1857, in which it was decided to deprive any inhabitant of African descent, whether slaves or not, the right to citizenship; and the authority to prohibit slavery in federal territories of the country was removed from Congress. The decision was drafted by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney. The fury that caused this ruling among the abolitionists was an important factor in the explosion of the Civil War.

Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're glad you chose Westonci.ca. Revisit us for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.