Discover answers to your most pressing questions at Westonci.ca, the ultimate Q&A platform that connects you with expert solutions. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Answer: The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
Explanation:
Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.