Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of seasoned experts on our user-friendly platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Answer: The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
Explanation:
Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.