Welcome to Westonci.ca, the Q&A platform where your questions are met with detailed answers from experienced experts. Ask your questions and receive detailed answers from professionals with extensive experience in various fields. Experience the ease of finding precise answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts.
Sagot :
The Gibbons v. Ogden court case in a nutshell:
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Ogden had a monopoly on operating steamboats on the Lower Mississippi.
Gibbons, who had a federal liscence to operate steamboats, tried to start business there and was sued by Ogden.
The ruling was that Gibbons would be allowed to operate there, which gave precedent to federal law over state law.
Answer: The case set definitions for navigation and placed federal control over all coastal and river trade.
Explanation:
Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.