Westonci.ca is the best place to get answers to your questions, provided by a community of experienced and knowledgeable experts. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.
Sagot :
start with the original equation (length + width= perimeter)
2l + 2w = P
we know here that the length (l) is 2 more than the width (w),
from this we can say [w= l+2]
put the new w back into the equation
2l + [l+2] = P
now the equation only has one variable, we can simplify it to
3l + 2 = P
we know (from the given information in the origial problem) that the perimeter is 64.
3l + 2 = 64
tada, not we solve (subtract 2 from both sides)
3l = 62
(divide by 3)
l = 20.67
the length is 20.67
the width is 18.67
:)
2l + 2w = P
we know here that the length (l) is 2 more than the width (w),
from this we can say [w= l+2]
put the new w back into the equation
2l + [l+2] = P
now the equation only has one variable, we can simplify it to
3l + 2 = P
we know (from the given information in the origial problem) that the perimeter is 64.
3l + 2 = 64
tada, not we solve (subtract 2 from both sides)
3l = 62
(divide by 3)
l = 20.67
the length is 20.67
the width is 18.67
:)
We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.