Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
The way you wrote it, it should be 60.
But the way I think you meant to write it was [tex](3)(7 ^{n-1} )[/tex]
Which in this case, 3-1=2 so (3)([tex]7 ^{2} [/tex])=147
But the way I think you meant to write it was [tex](3)(7 ^{n-1} )[/tex]
Which in this case, 3-1=2 so (3)([tex]7 ^{2} [/tex])=147
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.
