At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.


Which phrase best describes the New World Order?

A. a foreign policy stance that advocates multilateral engagement for the good and protection of an allied country

B. a foreign policy stance that sets up a hierarchy within an alliance and puts the interests of the United States first

C. a foreign policy stance that seeks to open markets, protects the interests of the United States above all, and defends weaker nations

D. a foreign policy stance that espouses a unilateral approach to protecting the best interests of the United States


Sagot :

The New World order was a foreign policy stance that advocates multilateral engagement for the good and protection of an allied Country.

Answer:

A. a foreign policy stance that advocates multilateral engagement for the good and protection of an allied country

Explanation:

The New World Order - or New World Geopolitical Order - means the international geopolitical plane of power and force correlations between National States after the end of the Cold War.

With the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989 and the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, the world was faced with a new political configuration. The sovereignty of the United States and of capitalism extended to practically the whole world and NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) was consolidated as the largest and most powerful international military treaty. The planet, which was once in the so-called Cold War Bipolar Order, began to look for a new term to designate the new political plan.

The first term that can be designated to define the New World Order is unipolarity, since, from a military point of view, the US has become sovereign in the face of the impossibility of any other country to rival the Americans in this regard.

The second expression used is multipolarity, because after the end of the Cold War, military might was no longer the main criterion to be established to determine the global potentiality of a National State, but economic power. In this plan, new fronts emerged to rival the USA, namely: Japan and the European Union, at first, and China at a second, especially from the late 2000s.

Finally, we have a third, more consensual proposal: unimultipolarity. This term is used to denote the dual character of the global order of power: “uni” to designate US military and political supremacy and “multi” to designate multiple centers of economic power.