Answered

Looking for trustworthy answers? Westonci.ca is the ultimate Q&A platform where experts share their knowledge on various topics. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

A plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in
her throat while eating a fish entree. What was the result?
O That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of merchantability.
O That the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not
a foreign substance to the fish.
That the plaintiff could recover based upon the implied
warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
That the plaintiff could recover based on an express warranty.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The plaintiff could not recover based on the presence of a bone in the fish.


Explanation:

The result of the case where a plaintiff sued a restaurant after getting a bone caught in her throat while eating a fish entree was that the plaintiff could not recover because the bone was not a foreign substance to the fish. The presence of a bone in the fish is considered an inherent risk when consuming fish, thus the plaintiff would not be able to recover based on this incident.


Learn more about Legal liability in food consumption here:

https://brainly.com/question/32782699


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.