King Leopold II is not as reviled as Hitler or Stalin due to differences in historical perceptions and the recognition of their actions. Leopold II's brutal exploitation in the Congo, while horrific, is often overshadowed by the larger-scale atrocities committed by Hitler and Stalin.
King Leopold II of Belgium is not as reviled as Hitler or Stalin due to the differences in how their actions are perceived and portrayed historically. While Hitler and Stalin are known for their direct roles in large-scale atrocities during World War II and in the Soviet Union, King Leopold II's atrocities in the Congo Free State are often not as widely taught or recognized.
Leopold II's establishment of the Congo Free State resulted in extreme exploitation, violence, and a system of forced labor that led to the deaths of millions of Congolese people. His pursuit of economic gains through palm oil, rubber, and mineral extraction involved brutal methods of exploitation and control over the native populations.
Despite the horrors inflicted during Leopold II's rule, his actions in the Congo were more related to colonial exploitation rather than direct involvement in a global conflict like Hitler and Stalin. The level of recognition and condemnation King Leopold II receives is often influenced by the depth of knowledge and awareness of his actions in comparison to the more widely documented atrocities of Hitler and Stalin.
https://brainly.com/question/41131215
