Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions are answered by a community of knowledgeable contributors. Experience the ease of finding quick and accurate answers to your questions from professionals on our platform. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from a wide range of professionals on our user-friendly platform.

6.4) If a writer had a multitude of facts about a topic but no general statement about the topic, she would probably use.
critical deduction
inductive reasoning
deductive reasoning
persuasion
analytical ideas


Sagot :

Final answer:

Inductive reasoning starts from specific details to form a general conclusion, while deductive reasoning begins with a general concept to reach specific conclusions. Writers with many facts but no overarching statement often utilize inductive reasoning.


Explanation:

Inductive reasoning involves moving from specific to broad ideas by collecting details, observations, and facts to draw a general conclusion. On the other hand, deductive reasoning starts with a general concept and works towards specific conclusions based on it. For writers with numerous facts but lacking a general statement, inductive reasoning would likely be the approach they would use.


Learn more about Logical reasoning here:

https://brainly.com/question/34212737