Westonci.ca is the Q&A platform that connects you with experts who provide accurate and detailed answers. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.
Sagot :
Final answer:
President Obama's response involves a hasty generalization fallacy when connecting non-payment for meals to contributing to the national debt.
Explanation:
The rhetorical device used by President Barack Obama in the given scenario is hasty generalization. Hasty generalization occurs when a conclusion is reached based on insufficient examples, not necessarily representative of the overall claim being made. In this case, accusing individuals who don't pay for meals of also not paying taxes, thus contributing to the national debt, is a hasty generalization.
Using a biased sample by focusing on a specific group of individuals (diners at expensive restaurants) to draw a broad conclusion about tax payment and national debt is another related fallacy. This fallacy undermines the argument's credibility due to the lack of comprehensive and diverse evidence.
It is important to avoid hasty generalizations and biased samples in arguments to ensure the validity and soundness of the conclusions drawn from the presented examples.
Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:
https://brainly.com/question/29368484
We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed by returning for our latest expert advice.