Westonci.ca connects you with experts who provide insightful answers to your questions. Join us today and start learning! Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
Fallacious reasoning occurs when connecting soccer heading with unsupported claims like long-term dangers or disregarding known facts like soccer headings causing concussions.
Explanation:
Begging the question is a fallacious reasoning where the conclusion is assumed in the premise. An example of this would be stating that no one should be allowed to play soccer because it is dangerous without providing substantial evidence to support the claim.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy, meaning "after this, therefore because of this," is often seen in false cause arguments. For instance, connecting soccer headings to unrelated issues like long-term dangers without concrete evidence falls under this fallacy.
Fallacious reasoning occurs when arguments lack logical validity. Claiming that soccer headings do not cause concussions without reliable data or support is another misleading example of fallacious reasoning.
Learn more about logical fallacies here:
https://brainly.com/question/29368484
Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for choosing Westonci.ca as your information source. We look forward to your next visit.