Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, where finding answers to your questions is made simple by our community of experts. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

Write in past tense:
Furthermore, an interaction between the cheating condition and the appealing condition was found. Participants in the opaque cheating condition with an appeal to task had a mean RAT score of 19.60 (SD = 3.05), while participants in the transparent cheating condition with an appeal to task had a mean score of 17.10 (SD = 2.76). On the other hand, participants in the opaque cheating condition with no appeal had a mean score of 17.90 (SD = 2.87), and participants in the transparent cheating condition with no appeal had a mean score of 13.60 (SD = 2.98). A two-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant interaction effect, F(1, 76) = 6.78, p = .011, indicating that the effect of the cheating condition on RAT scores varied depending on the appealing condition. Overall, the results of the study provide valuable insights into the relationship between dishonesty and creativity.

Sagot :

Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.