Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform.

Dr. Simpson found a +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent
crimes in a community. Which of the following represents the best interpretation of
this result?
Multiple Choice
О
О
Ice cream causes people to become more violent and
aggressive.
Ice cream consumption is not related to violent crime.
A third variable, such as heat, may account for the
association between ice cream sales and violent crime.
Violent people like ice cream more than nonviolent
people.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream sales and violent crimes does not indicate causation; a third variable likely influences both. Understanding the correlation-causation fallacy is crucial in interpreting such data.


Explanation:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent crimes does not mean ice cream causes violence. The most plausible explanation is the presence of a third variable, such as heat, influencing both ice cream sales and crime rates. This demonstrates the correlation-causation fallacy where a correlation does not necessarily imply causation.


Learn more about Correlation and Causation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30912507


We appreciate your visit. Our platform is always here to offer accurate and reliable answers. Return anytime. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Keep exploring Westonci.ca for more insightful answers to your questions. We're here to help.