Answered

Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

Dr. Simpson found a +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent
crimes in a community. Which of the following represents the best interpretation of
this result?
Multiple Choice
О
О
Ice cream causes people to become more violent and
aggressive.
Ice cream consumption is not related to violent crime.
A third variable, such as heat, may account for the
association between ice cream sales and violent crime.
Violent people like ice cream more than nonviolent
people.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream sales and violent crimes does not indicate causation; a third variable likely influences both. Understanding the correlation-causation fallacy is crucial in interpreting such data.


Explanation:

A +.50 correlation between ice cream cone sales and violent crimes does not mean ice cream causes violence. The most plausible explanation is the presence of a third variable, such as heat, influencing both ice cream sales and crime rates. This demonstrates the correlation-causation fallacy where a correlation does not necessarily imply causation.


Learn more about Correlation and Causation here:

https://brainly.com/question/30912507


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.