Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the answers you need, thanks to our active and informed community. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was not found in South Japan but in South Australia, dating back about 650 million years ago.


Explanation:

The statement that the earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was found in South Japan is not true. The correct location is South Australia. The fossils, including sponge-like creatures with hard body parts, date back to about 650 million years ago, predating the Ediacaran period.


Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

https://brainly.com/question/751397


Thanks for using our service. We aim to provide the most accurate answers for all your queries. Visit us again for more insights. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.