Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the ultimate question and answer platform. Get expert answers to your questions quickly and accurately. Discover the answers you need from a community of experts ready to help you with their knowledge and experience in various fields. Get quick and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our platform.

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?
It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was not found in South Japan but in South Australia, dating back about 650 million years ago.


Explanation:

The statement that the earliest fossil evidence for a multi-cellular animal was found in South Japan is not true. The correct location is South Australia. The fossils, including sponge-like creatures with hard body parts, date back to about 650 million years ago, predating the Ediacaran period.


Learn more about Earliest fossil evidence for multi-cellular animal here:

https://brainly.com/question/751397


Thanks for stopping by. We are committed to providing the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.