Answered

Discover answers to your questions with Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A platform that connects you with knowledgeable experts. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court determined that
laws that promote a particular religion may be allowed if they:
о
a.) don't involve federal funds.
о
b.) also serve a secular purpose.
4
c.) inhibit other religious practices.
d.) are Christian in nature.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court established the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws related to religion in government.


Explanation:

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) introduced the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws involving religion in government. This test states that for a law to be considered constitutional, it must have a legitimate secular purpose, its primary effect must not advance or inhibit religion, and there should be no excessive entanglement between government and religion.


Learn more about Lemon v. Kurtzman here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767086


We hope our answers were useful. Return anytime for more information and answers to any other questions you have. Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.