Answered

Find the best solutions to your questions at Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A platform with a community of knowledgeable experts. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court determined that
laws that promote a particular religion may be allowed if they:
о
a.) don't involve federal funds.
о
b.) also serve a secular purpose.
4
c.) inhibit other religious practices.
d.) are Christian in nature.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court established the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws related to religion in government.


Explanation:

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) introduced the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws involving religion in government. This test states that for a law to be considered constitutional, it must have a legitimate secular purpose, its primary effect must not advance or inhibit religion, and there should be no excessive entanglement between government and religion.


Learn more about Lemon v. Kurtzman here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767086


Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.