Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Discover a wealth of knowledge from professionals across various disciplines on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Experience the convenience of finding accurate answers to your questions from knowledgeable experts on our platform.

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court determined that
laws that promote a particular religion may be allowed if they:
о
a.) don't involve federal funds.
о
b.) also serve a secular purpose.
4
c.) inhibit other religious practices.
d.) are Christian in nature.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

In Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971), the Supreme Court established the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws related to religion in government.


Explanation:

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) introduced the Lemon Test to determine the constitutionality of laws involving religion in government. This test states that for a law to be considered constitutional, it must have a legitimate secular purpose, its primary effect must not advance or inhibit religion, and there should be no excessive entanglement between government and religion.


Learn more about Lemon v. Kurtzman here:

https://brainly.com/question/30767086


Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.