Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing precise answers to your questions in different areas. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

V. Bakke
QUESTION 7
Which of the following court cases did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that extra points for race were allowe
University of Michigan's Law School because there were other items in the process, such as an interview
Gratz v. Bollinger
Grutter v. Bollinger
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Friends for School Admissions v. Harvard
Click Save and Submit to save and submit. Click Save All Answers to save all answers.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy, allowing race as one of several factors in admissions.


Explanation:

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) was the U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the University of Michigan Law School's affirmative action admissions policy.

The Court ruled in a 5-4 decision that considering race as one of several factors in admissions was acceptable, while rejecting the use of strict quotas for minority students.

Individualized evaluation of candidates with race as just one criterion is permissible, as ruled in the Grutter case.


Learn more about affirmative action in Higher Education admissions here:

https://brainly.com/question/51135973


Thank you for your visit. We're committed to providing you with the best information available. Return anytime for more. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. Discover more at Westonci.ca. Return for the latest expert answers and updates on various topics.