Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find solutions to your questions quickly and accurately. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
To determine if the given set of ordered pairs represents a function, we need to understand the definition of a function. In mathematics, a relation is a function if and only if every element in the domain (the set of all possible x-values) corresponds to exactly one element in the codomain (the set of all possible y-values). In other words, each x-value must map to one and only one y-value.
Let's analyze the given set of ordered pairs:
[tex]\[ \{(-2, 2), (-1, 2), (3, -1), (3, 1), (4, 11)\} \][/tex]
1. List the x-values of each pair:
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(-1\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex]
2. Check for duplicate x-values:
We see that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] appears twice: once in the ordered pair [tex]\((3, -1)\)[/tex] and once in the ordered pair [tex]\((3, 1)\)[/tex]. This means that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values: [tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex].
3. Determine if it meets the definition of a function:
Because the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values ([tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex]), this relation does not meet the definition of a function. A function requires that each x-value maps to exactly one y-value.
Now let's address the given options:
- Option A: No, because one x-value corresponds to two different y-values.
- This is correct. We have shown that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to both [tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex].
- Option B: No, because two of the y-values are the same.
- This is not a valid reason. Having the same y-values does not violate the definition of a function.
- Option C: Yes, because there are two x-values that are the same.
- This is incorrect. The mere fact that x-values are the same does not mean it is a function. What matters is that each x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.
- Option D: Yes, because every x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.
- This is incorrect, as we’ve established that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values.
The correct answer is Option A: No, because one x-value corresponds to two different y-values.
Let's analyze the given set of ordered pairs:
[tex]\[ \{(-2, 2), (-1, 2), (3, -1), (3, 1), (4, 11)\} \][/tex]
1. List the x-values of each pair:
- [tex]\(-2\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(-1\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(3\)[/tex]
- [tex]\(4\)[/tex]
2. Check for duplicate x-values:
We see that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] appears twice: once in the ordered pair [tex]\((3, -1)\)[/tex] and once in the ordered pair [tex]\((3, 1)\)[/tex]. This means that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values: [tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex].
3. Determine if it meets the definition of a function:
Because the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values ([tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex]), this relation does not meet the definition of a function. A function requires that each x-value maps to exactly one y-value.
Now let's address the given options:
- Option A: No, because one x-value corresponds to two different y-values.
- This is correct. We have shown that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to both [tex]\(-1\)[/tex] and [tex]\(1\)[/tex].
- Option B: No, because two of the y-values are the same.
- This is not a valid reason. Having the same y-values does not violate the definition of a function.
- Option C: Yes, because there are two x-values that are the same.
- This is incorrect. The mere fact that x-values are the same does not mean it is a function. What matters is that each x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.
- Option D: Yes, because every x-value corresponds to exactly one y-value.
- This is incorrect, as we’ve established that the x-value [tex]\(3\)[/tex] corresponds to two different y-values.
The correct answer is Option A: No, because one x-value corresponds to two different y-values.
We appreciate your time on our site. Don't hesitate to return whenever you have more questions or need further clarification. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. We're here to help at Westonci.ca. Keep visiting for the best answers to your questions.