Westonci.ca offers fast, accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need now. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts on our user-friendly platform. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced professionals on our platform.

While the agents were present at 313 N.E. Brook, Joe, a neighbor, came over to direct the agents to a shed on Joe's property that he had permitted the 313 people to use. The agents searched that shed finding marijuana. The crime lab compared known fingerprints of the 313 people to those found on the marijuana wrappings. The fingerprints matched. Should a judge allow the marijuana and the fingerprint evidence.
a. No, because the agents did not obtain a search warrant to search Joe's shed.
b. No, because the evidence found in the shed was tainted by the search from the house at 313.
c. Yes, because the evidence in the shed was a result of the search at 313.
d. Yes, because the evidence in the shed was obtained from a consent search separate from the search of 313.

Sagot :

We hope you found this helpful. Feel free to come back anytime for more accurate answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting. Our goal is to provide the most accurate answers for all your informational needs. Come back soon. Thank you for trusting Westonci.ca. Don't forget to revisit us for more accurate and insightful answers.