Answered

Welcome to Westonci.ca, the place where your questions find answers from a community of knowledgeable experts. Explore comprehensive solutions to your questions from knowledgeable professionals across various fields on our platform. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

How did the courts determine an illegal restraint of trade?
(A) They established the rule of reason in 1911.
(B) They determined what share of the market a company controlled.
C They judged the size of the company, targeting ones deemed too large.
D) They left the definition to the state legislatures.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The courts determine an illegal restraint of trade by applying the rule of reason, focusing on specific behaviors rather than company size or structure.


Explanation:

The courts determined an illegal restraint of trade through the application of the rule of reason, which considers the specific behaviors of companies rather than their size or structure. For example, in cases like Eastman Kodak and United Shoe Machinery, the courts assessed the reasonableness of their conduct despite their dominant market positions. This approach emphasizes evaluating whether business practices are achieved through legitimate means.


Learn more about Antitrust Law and the Rule of Reason here:

https://brainly.com/question/32337247


We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.