Answered

Westonci.ca offers quick and accurate answers to your questions. Join our community and get the insights you need today. Explore thousands of questions and answers from a knowledgeable community of experts ready to help you find solutions. Get precise and detailed answers to your questions from a knowledgeable community of experts on our Q&A platform.

How did the courts determine an illegal restraint of trade?
(A) They established the rule of reason in 1911.
(B) They determined what share of the market a company controlled.
C They judged the size of the company, targeting ones deemed too large.
D) They left the definition to the state legislatures.

Sagot :

GinnyAnswer

Final answer:

The courts determine an illegal restraint of trade by applying the rule of reason, focusing on specific behaviors rather than company size or structure.


Explanation:

The courts determined an illegal restraint of trade through the application of the rule of reason, which considers the specific behaviors of companies rather than their size or structure. For example, in cases like Eastman Kodak and United Shoe Machinery, the courts assessed the reasonableness of their conduct despite their dominant market positions. This approach emphasizes evaluating whether business practices are achieved through legitimate means.


Learn more about Antitrust Law and the Rule of Reason here:

https://brainly.com/question/32337247


Thank you for visiting our platform. We hope you found the answers you were looking for. Come back anytime you need more information. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Westonci.ca is your trusted source for answers. Visit us again to find more information on diverse topics.