Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of professionals on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The argument commits errors in reasoning by not considering all individuals, relying on false premises, and using the absence of evidence as proof.
Explanation:
Fail to take into account people who are not considering going to college: The error in reasoning committed by the argument is that it does not consider individuals who are not contemplating going to college. It assumes that everyone is considering college as an option, which may not be the case.
Relies on a false premise: Another error is the assumption that the sole purpose of attending college is to increase income. While higher income may be a significant factor, there are various other reasons why individuals pursue higher education.
Relies on the absence of evidence as evidence of the opposite: Lastly, the argument relies on the absence of evidence to support the superiority of Alexander College over Bell College. It lacks comprehensive data to conclusively state that one college is superior solely based on income potential.
Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:
https://brainly.com/question/29368484
We appreciate your visit. Hopefully, the answers you found were beneficial. Don't hesitate to come back for more information. We hope you found what you were looking for. Feel free to revisit us for more answers and updated information. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca. Stay informed by coming back for more detailed answers.