Discover a world of knowledge at Westonci.ca, where experts and enthusiasts come together to answer your questions. Our platform offers a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of knowledgeable professionals. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The argument commits errors in reasoning by not considering all individuals, relying on false premises, and using the absence of evidence as proof.
Explanation:
Fail to take into account people who are not considering going to college: The error in reasoning committed by the argument is that it does not consider individuals who are not contemplating going to college. It assumes that everyone is considering college as an option, which may not be the case.
Relies on a false premise: Another error is the assumption that the sole purpose of attending college is to increase income. While higher income may be a significant factor, there are various other reasons why individuals pursue higher education.
Relies on the absence of evidence as evidence of the opposite: Lastly, the argument relies on the absence of evidence to support the superiority of Alexander College over Bell College. It lacks comprehensive data to conclusively state that one college is superior solely based on income potential.
Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:
https://brainly.com/question/29368484
Your visit means a lot to us. Don't hesitate to return for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. We hope this was helpful. Please come back whenever you need more information or answers to your queries. Get the answers you need at Westonci.ca. Stay informed with our latest expert advice.