Explore Westonci.ca, the top Q&A platform where your questions are answered by professionals and enthusiasts alike. Discover reliable solutions to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform. Connect with a community of professionals ready to provide precise solutions to your questions quickly and accurately.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The argument commits errors in reasoning by not considering all individuals, relying on false premises, and using the absence of evidence as proof.
Explanation:
Fail to take into account people who are not considering going to college: The error in reasoning committed by the argument is that it does not consider individuals who are not contemplating going to college. It assumes that everyone is considering college as an option, which may not be the case.
Relies on a false premise: Another error is the assumption that the sole purpose of attending college is to increase income. While higher income may be a significant factor, there are various other reasons why individuals pursue higher education.
Relies on the absence of evidence as evidence of the opposite: Lastly, the argument relies on the absence of evidence to support the superiority of Alexander College over Bell College. It lacks comprehensive data to conclusively state that one college is superior solely based on income potential.
Learn more about Logical Fallacies here:
https://brainly.com/question/29368484
Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Westonci.ca is your go-to source for reliable answers. Return soon for more expert insights.