Welcome to Westonci.ca, where curiosity meets expertise. Ask any question and receive fast, accurate answers from our knowledgeable community. Connect with a community of experts ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.

The police were convinced that Melinda robbed the BANK. They arrested her, read her Miranda rights, and held her for questioning for 60 hours. Although she repeatedly asked for an attorney, the police would not allow her to contact one. She was kept awake during the entire 60 hours, not given water when she asked for it, and denied bathroom privileges. Finally, exhausted and near hysteria, she confessed to the BANK robbery. She provided details that only the bank robber could know, and it was clear she was guilty. Melinda's confession is

a. Inadmissible because the confession was elicited in direct violation of Melinda's 5th Amendment rights.
b. Inadmissible because Melinda had not been given her Miranda warnings.
c. ADMISSIBLE because Melinda was, in fact, guilty of the crime.
d. Admissible because Melinda ultimately gave information which only the ebank robber could know.


Sagot :

Thank you for your visit. We are dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for stopping by. We strive to provide the best answers for all your questions. See you again soon. Thank you for visiting Westonci.ca, your go-to source for reliable answers. Come back soon for more expert insights.