Welcome to Westonci.ca, where you can find answers to all your questions from a community of experienced professionals. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our user-friendly Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.
Explanation:
Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/31697379
Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. We appreciate your time. Please revisit us for more reliable answers to any questions you may have. Westonci.ca is committed to providing accurate answers. Come back soon for more trustworthy information.