Explore Westonci.ca, the premier Q&A site that helps you find precise answers to your questions, no matter the topic. Experience the convenience of getting accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of professionals. Discover detailed answers to your questions from a wide network of experts on our comprehensive Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.
Explanation:
Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/31697379
Visit us again for up-to-date and reliable answers. We're always ready to assist you with your informational needs. We appreciate your time. Please come back anytime for the latest information and answers to your questions. Westonci.ca is here to provide the answers you seek. Return often for more expert solutions.