Explore Westonci.ca, the leading Q&A site where experts provide accurate and helpful answers to all your questions. Join our platform to connect with experts ready to provide precise answers to your questions in various areas. Get detailed and accurate answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform.
Sagot :
Final answer:
The excerpt in option B from Tinker v. Des Moines demonstrates how precedent supports the argument for protected student expression based on the Court's ruling regarding disruptive conduct.
Explanation:
Precedent is crucial in legal arguments, as seen in Tinker v. Des Moines where the Court upheld students' rights to express themselves freely unless their actions materially and substantially interfere with school operations. In the excerpt provided, option B showcases how precedent from the Court's ruling in Tinker v. Des Moines is used to explain why the armbands worn by students did not disrupt classwork, supporting an argument for protected expression.
Learn more about Tinker v. Des Moines here:
https://brainly.com/question/31697379
Thank you for your visit. We're dedicated to helping you find the information you need, whenever you need it. Thanks for using our service. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Stay curious and keep coming back to Westonci.ca for answers to all your burning questions.