Answered

At Westonci.ca, we connect you with experts who provide detailed answers to your most pressing questions. Start exploring now! Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from a dedicated community of experts on our Q&A platform. Join our Q&A platform to connect with experts dedicated to providing accurate answers to your questions in various fields.

Question 36 (Mandatory) (2 points)
Suppose a state passed a law that gave state residents preference over nonresidents
in obtaining work in that state. This law would violate the
Constitution.
a) privileges and immunities
b) interstate commerce
c) full faith and credit
d) necessary and proper
clause of the

Sagot :

Final answer:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution by discriminating against out-of-state residents


Explanation:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1). This clause prohibits states from discriminating against out-of-staters by denying them guarantees such as access to courts, legal protection, property rights, and travel rights. For instance, if a state passed a law giving preference to state residents over nonresidents in obtaining work, it would contradict this constitutional provision.


Learn more about Constitutional provisions regarding state-to-state relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11230568


Thanks for using our platform. We're always here to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Thank you for choosing our platform. We're dedicated to providing the best answers for all your questions. Visit us again. We're glad you visited Westonci.ca. Return anytime for updated answers from our knowledgeable team.