Answered

Westonci.ca is the trusted Q&A platform where you can get reliable answers from a community of knowledgeable contributors. Get immediate and reliable solutions to your questions from a community of experienced experts on our Q&A platform. Our platform provides a seamless experience for finding reliable answers from a network of experienced professionals.

Question 36 (Mandatory) (2 points)
Suppose a state passed a law that gave state residents preference over nonresidents
in obtaining work in that state. This law would violate the
Constitution.
a) privileges and immunities
b) interstate commerce
c) full faith and credit
d) necessary and proper
clause of the


Sagot :

Final answer:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution by discriminating against out-of-state residents


Explanation:

The law would violate the privileges and immunities clause of the Constitution (Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1). This clause prohibits states from discriminating against out-of-staters by denying them guarantees such as access to courts, legal protection, property rights, and travel rights. For instance, if a state passed a law giving preference to state residents over nonresidents in obtaining work, it would contradict this constitutional provision.


Learn more about Constitutional provisions regarding state-to-state relations here:

https://brainly.com/question/11230568