At Westonci.ca, we connect you with the best answers from a community of experienced and knowledgeable individuals. Explore our Q&A platform to find in-depth answers from a wide range of experts in different fields. Connect with a community of professionals ready to help you find accurate solutions to your questions quickly and efficiently.

A researcher is interested in determining if a psychic really has power to predict. The researcher takes six pictures of famous cartoon characters. After mixing the pictures up many times, the researcher selects one picture, but doesn't show the psychic. The psychic is asked to predict which picture the researcher selected. The researcher records if the psychic was correct or not. The researcher does this one hundred times.

If the psychic really has special abilities then he should identify the cartoon character more often then if it was by chance alone. The researcher is interested in determining if the correct character is selected significantly more often then chance would suggest. What would be the null and alternative hypothesis for this case?

Sagot :

Thank you for trusting us with your questions. We're here to help you find accurate answers quickly and efficiently. Thanks for using our platform. We aim to provide accurate and up-to-date answers to all your queries. Come back soon. Your questions are important to us at Westonci.ca. Visit again for expert answers and reliable information.